Introduction

Row

Average Detentions per Month

11.2

Percent of Detentions include Search or Frisk

66

Ratio of Black to White Citizens Detained

2.4

Row

About the Data

A temporary detention involves a police officer holding and questioning an individual for a short amount of time. The police only need reasonable suspicion for a temporary detention. Detentions may be accompanied by some form of search or frisk, though not all detentions involve a search. Detentions can be dispatched in response to a call or initiated by an officer.

This analysis is based on records of temporary detentions made by the City of Charlottesville Police. The data was received in response to Freedom of Information Act requests by Jeff Fogel made over multiple time periods. Each data set was structured slightly differently, and the data for 2012 and 2014 covered only half of each year.

Navigate to additional pages for further analysis:

  • Who? Who is detained? How does the percent of Black and White citizens detained compare to the overall population in the city.
  • Where? Where are citizens detained? In what neighborhoods do detentions occur and how does this compare to the underlying population of that area?
  • Why? Why do police retain citizens? What reasons are recorded by the police for the detention across Black and White residents.

Detentions in Charlottesville by Race

Who?

Row

Detentions per 1000 population for Black residents per year

10

Detentions per 1000 population for White residents per year

1

Row

Detentions Relative to Population

Population estimates are from the 5-year American Community Survey 2013-2017 estimates, to overlap with the time period of the detention data; population percents are based on only the Black and White populations of Charlottesville to align with data on race available in the detention data.

By Year

By Stop and Frisk

Where?

Where Do Police Detain People?

Map Details

  • These maps display police detentions from both time periods, 2012-2014 and 2016-2017.
  • Each point represents one individual stopped.
  • Points do not represent the exact locations of each stop, but the density of the dots represents the density of detainments in a geographic area.
  • To help guide your eyes, detentions that include Search and Frisk are circled in red.
  • Turn on and off underlying population characteristics through the box on the right
  • Note that the underlying population percentages are based on a comparison of White and Black populations only to align with the races identifiable in the police data files.

Row

Detentions 2012 - 2014 & 2016 - 2017

Detentions by Beat

Row

Changes Over Time

Trends:

  • Greater dispersion of stop and frisk throughout the city during the 2017
  • Noticeable decrease of stop and frisk in the Rose Hill nieghborhood.
  • Stop and frisk of black individuals in areas with predominantly student housing increased, specifically in the Grady, Rugby Road, and Emmet Street Areas in addition to the areas south of west main by the train tracks and Jefferson Park Avenue.
  • Stop and Frisk increased significantly, particularly for black individuals, in the Prospect/Orangedale Ave area.

Row

2012-2014

2016-2017

Row

Over Policing & Exclusive Spaces

The data does not record why police enter certain spaces, whether it is an officer-initiated discretionary stop or a response to a call. We also do not have data on whether or not a detainment led to an arrest. The offense listed is the reason the police officer recorded to justify the stop based on reasonable suspicion, not a determination that the offense occured. Beacuse of this, it is difficult to say that police detainments are an indicator of crime. Fewer detainments does not immediatley signify less crime in an area, just less police activity.

Below, we highlight three areas, a predominantly black residential space, a predominantly white residential space, and a public walking mall to investigate who police detain and where.

Row

Ridge Street & Prospect-Orangedale Neighborhoods

Martha Jefferson & Locust Grove Neighborhoods

Row

Downtown

# A tibble: 9 x 8
# Groups:   NAME, RACE [6]
  NAME               BEAT_NO RACE  SFTYPE           Counts total RaceTot lab_pos
  <chr>                <dbl> <fct> <chr>             <dbl> <int>   <dbl>   <dbl>
1 "Martha Jefferson"       8 Black STOP WITH SEARC…     -2     6      -2      -4
2 "Martha Jefferson"       8 White Search WITHOUT …      3     6       4       6
3 "Martha Jefferson"       8 White STOP WITH SEARC…      1     6       4       6
4 "Prospect\\Orange…      21 Black Search WITHOUT …     -7    29     -22     -24
5 "Prospect\\Orange…      21 Black STOP WITH SEARC…    -15    29     -22     -24
6 "Prospect\\Orange…      21 White STOP WITH SEARC…      7    29       7       9
7 "Ridge St"              12 Black Search WITHOUT …     -8    75     -64     -66
8 "Ridge St"              12 Black STOP WITH SEARC…    -56    75     -64     -66
9 "Ridge St"              12 White STOP WITH SEARC…     11    75      11      13

Analysis

Historically, racial covenants prohibited Black individuals from living in the Martha Jefferson and Locust Grove. That legacy continues today

  • An estimated 1401 White individuals live in the Martha Jefferson and Locust Grove Neighborhoods
  • 3 (2.14 for every 1000) White individuals were detained in the Martha Jefferson and Locust Grove Neighborhoods
  • An estimated 1731 Black individuals live in in Prospect Orangedale Ave and Ridge St Neighborhoods
  • 68 (39 for every 1000) Black individuals were detained in the Prospect Orangedale Ave and Ridge St Neighborhoods

The Downtown Mall is a public space for free use by Charlottesville residents.

  • In the periods of 2012 -2014 and 2016-2017, 26 Black individuals were detained by police
  • 22 White individuals were detained in the same period.
  • 73% of Black individuals stopped (19 individuals) were also searched and frisked
  • 31% (7) of White individuals were also searched and frisked.

Why?

What Reasons do Police Give for Detentions?

Police officers record a reason for detaining an individual. We recoded these reasons into the following categories: (1) Narcotics related, (2) Suspicious circumstances, (3) Disorderly conduct (including drunkeness), (4) Crimes on persons (e.g., assult, robbery, weapons), (5) Crimes on property (e.g., burglary, vandalism, trespassing), (6) Traffic-related (e.g., traffic stops, violations, accidents), and (7) everything else (e.g., assistance, unidentified). While several of the reasons represent categories of crimes, the recorded reason reflects the reasonable suspicion of an officer at the time of the stop, not a conclusion that the given crime has been committed. We do not have a record for whether the stop led to an arrest for all of the data provided.

Row

Detention by Recorded Reason

The data from 2015 did not contain the reason for detention; detemtions from 2015 are not included here.

By Year

By Stop and Frisk

Resources

The Charlottesville policing data was acquired by attorney Jeff Fogel through Freedom of Information Act requests. The site was created by Michele Claibourn and Sam Powers, with contributions from Enrique Unruh, in a partnership between the Equity Center at UVA and Jordy Yager’s Determined series with Vinegar Hill Magazine and Charlottesville Tomorrow.

This is a work in progress and we plan to keep building and improving it. We appreciate all feedback – questions, corrections, concerns, ideas to make it better. You can reach us at CvilleEquityAtlas@virginia.edu. The source code to generate the analysis and this site are available on GitHub.

Resources on policing in the Charlottesville community