Orange Dot Report 6.0
Family Self-Sufficiency in the Charlottesville Region: Albemarle, Buckingham, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa, Nelson Counties & the City of Charlottesville, Virginia
Elizabeth Mitchell, Michele Claibourn, and Ridge Schuyler
October 21, 2024
Download Report PDFDownload Executive Summary PDF
Contents
Executive Summary
In the larger Charlottesville region, 14,990 families (22%) do not make enough money to meet their basic needs—housing, child care, food, transportation, health care, miscellaneous expenses (clothing, telephone, household items), and taxes. Rising costs and inflation along with stagnant wages and undervalued labor has made it increasingly difficult for families to be self-sufficient.
To keep up with the rise in the cost of necessities, Orange Dot 6.0 has recalibrated how it determines the annual income required for families to meet their basic needs, using the Self-Sufficiency Standard. The Self-Sufficiency Standard is a project of the Center for Women’s Welfare at the University of Washington’s School of Social Work that defines the real cost of living for working families.
The Self-Sufficiency Standard varies by locality and family size. For the City of Charlottesville, and Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, and Nelson counties, the Self-Sufficiency Standard for an average family is an annual income of around $60,000. For Louisa, the annual family income to meet basic needs is roughly $50,000, and for Buckingham, this value is around $45,000. A detailed breakdown of these costs and wages are provided in this report.
While families facing economic insecurity live throughout our region, the likelihood that a family is struggling varies by race and by place. The struggle is not equally shared.
47% of Black families and 35% of Hispanic families do not earn enough to meet their basic needs, compared to 18% of white families. This reflects a persistent gap resulting from past and ongoing policies that suppress investment, opportunity, and wealth creation in minoritized communities.
The percent of families struggling overall is highest in the City of Charlottesville at 27% and in Buckingham County, at 26%, and lowest in Albemarle County, at 18%.
Every locality in our region has areas where over a quarter (25%) of families have less than family-sufficient incomes. The areas with the highest percent of struggling families are in the City of Charlottesville, where the highest is 65%, and in Albemarle County, where despite having the lowest percent overall, has areas where nearly half the families struggle to meet their basic needs.
For a comparison with past reports, there are an estimated 7,330 families (11%) earning below $35,000 in the region. The Orange Dot Report 5.0, published in 2022, found 9,413 families (14%) in this same income range. As the population of the region has grown, the number of families earning under $35k has decreased. So we’ve made some progress as a community toward more economic mobility, but not nearly enough. The cost of living has steadily risen, making the $35,000 threshold less representative of the income required to meet the basic needs of working families.
As noted, our community has seen progress since this work began in 2011, but there are still too many struggling families. For a region as prosperous as ours, we have the means to build programs and enact policy that helps more families become self-sufficient.
Preface
The first Orange Dot Report was released in 2011, and it served both to describe the local income deficit—the gap between what families earn as income and what they need to be self-sufficient—and to develop strategies for creating pathways to self-sufficiency for families in the region. This initial effort launched the innovative Network2Work framework pioneered at Piedmont Virginia Community College, a process that brings together a Job-Seeker Network, an Employer Network, and a Provider Network to match job-seekers to family-sustaining jobs and careers and to connect them to community resources using neighborhood-based volunteers.
As Network2Work has grown, the Orange Dot Report has evolved and expanded, serving as a central resource and important update on the progress of the community. Initially focused on Charlottesville and Albemarle County in Orange Dot Report 2.0 (2015), the report encompassed the entire region (Albemarle, Buckingham, Charlottesville, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa, and Nelson) in Orange Dot Report 3.0 (2018), Orange Dot Report 4.0 (2021), and Orange Dot Report 5.0 (2022).1 Orange Dot Report 6.0 continues this evolution, incorporating new analysis and building on updated self-sufficiency standards. This report marks the second update completed in partnership between Network2Work@PVCC and The Equity Center at the University of Virginia. The collaboration and resulting analysis represent the continuation of our collective work toward a more equitable and fully thriving region.
Introduction
“When someone works for less pay than she can live on — when, for example, she goes hungry so that you can eat more cheaply and conveniently — then she has made a great sacrifice for you, she has made you a gift of some part of her abilities, her health, and her life. The ‘working poor,’ as they are approvingly termed, are in fact the major philanthropists of our society.” - Barbara Ehrenreich, “Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America” (2001)
Recent years have brought our country’s and our community’s ongoing struggles and inequities into stark relief. The housing affordability crisis, inflation and the rising costs of groceries, and the frequency and volatility of climate events have created challenges for all of us. But low-income individuals, especially individuals of color, are suffering disproportionately, both physically and financially.
Despite working hard, too many families struggle to make ends meet, in part because their labor is not valued, and we accept their sacrifice. Many people laboring in positions considered essential to our community do not earn enough to provide for their families. For example, the so-called “caring economy”—childcare workers, home health aides, teachers—provides enormous social value, but is not valued by the market. Changes in the labor market that have increased the number of underemployed part-time workers—those who want more hours or full-time work—add further strain.2
We all seek security and stability: to provide for ourselves and our families, to see our children thrive, to create community with others, to live with dignity. For families experiencing economic insecurity, all of this is jeopardized. When faced daily with financial struggles—to pay for housing, to repair the car that carries you to work, to access needed healthcare, to find and afford a safe environment for your children—it is difficult to be the parent you want to be, the worker you know you could be, or the person you were meant to be. We all deserve a chance to succeed and flourish, but we are not all yet given equal access to that chance. Toward that end, we must seek to build an equitable economy, one intentionally constructed to fulfill America’s promise of opportunity for all.
Our whole community benefits when the families have access to jobs that pay sufficient incomes. The many collective advantages include:
Children do better. Graduating from college continues to be the fastest route to economic security, yet economic insecurity limits access to higher education. As Robert Putnam’s work shows, “a family’s socioeconomic status [has] become even more important than test scores in predicting which eighth graders would graduate from college. High-scoring poor kids are now slightly less likely (29%) to get a college degree than low-scoring rich kids (30%).”3
Local businesses prosper. Employees are also consumers, and increased income among a region’s workers means more spending power, which is better for the economy, especially the local economy.
Taxpayers bear fewer costs. Given the chance, families want to provide for themselves. When they are able to do so, they require less support from others.
People live longer. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the biggest contributor to poor health is low socio-economic status. The Health Inequality Project estimates that a woman in the Charlottesville area in the lowest income quartile has a life expectancy of seven years less than a woman from the highest income quartile; among men in our region, the life expectancy gap is nearly ten years.4
The community thrives. A community thrives when its residents thrive. Residents thrive when their capacity as human beings is unleashed. And their capacity as human beings can only be unleashed when their basic needs are met.
Knowing that we can only solve issues we can understand, we provide a snapshot of the families in our community who are struggling. What we have learned since this work began in 2011 is that there are too many struggling families in our community, but not too many to help.
Defining Self-Sufficiency
The goal of the Orange Dot Report is to provide an overview of the families in our region that struggle to afford the basic necessities. To determine what annual income is required for a family in our region to be considered self-sufficient, this year’s report uses the Self-Sufficiency Standard, a project of the Center for Women’s Welfare at the University of Washington’s School of Social Work.5
The Self-Sufficiency Standard defines the income working families need to meet their basic necessities without public or private assistance. Basic minimum needs include: housing, child care, food, transportation, health care, miscellaneous expenses (clothing, telephone, household items), as well as the cost of taxes and the impact of tax credits. These expenses are calculated for each US county, taking into account family composition, ages of children, and geographic differences in costs. The values used in this report are specific to the cost of living in our region.6
The Standard has been used across the country by government entities, advocates, and service providers. Using this resource in the Orange Dot Report provides a reliable and well-researched measure for determining which families in our community struggle to meet their basic needs. The methods used by the Self-Sufficiency Standard are comparable to methods used in past Orange Dot Reports but include additional categories.7
The Self-Sufficiency Standard provides a breakdown of the real cost of all basic needs for over 700 different family compositions for each locality. Family compositions are described by the number of adults, infants, preschoolers, school age children, and teenagers in a family. For each locality in the greater Charlottesville area, we have provided a detailed table of the average costs, and the annual wage required to meet self-sufficiency based on the most common family compositions in this region. For tables of expenses and self-sufficient wages for specific family compositions (i.e. one adult, one infant and one school age child), please see the Appendix of this report.
Families Struggling in Our Region
There are 67,760 families living in the Charlottesville region, defined in this report as the City of Charlottesville and the surrounding counties of Albemarle, Buckingham, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa, and Nelson.8 Of these, 14,990 families (22%) do not earn enough to provide for their family’s basic needs.
The table below shows the estimated number of struggling families in each locality and the corresponding percent. The percent of families struggling overall is highest in the City of Charlottesville at 27% and in Buckingham County, at 26%, and lowest in Albemarle County, at 18%. Localities in our region vary in population, so that even though Albemarle has the lowest percent, it has the highest number of families struggling to meet their basic minimum needs, at over 5,000.
Summary of Struggling Families in the Region | ||
Number of Struggling Families | Percent of Struggling Families | |
---|---|---|
Albemarle County | 5,010 | 18% |
Buckingham County | 1,030 | 26% |
Charlottesville City | 2,370 | 27% |
Fluvanna County | 1,580 | 21% |
Greene County | 1,310 | 23% |
Louisa County | 2,410 | 23% |
Nelson County | 1,280 | 33% |
Total for Region | 14,990 | 22% |
Note: Values are approximate based on the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2018-2022) |
Working families in our community need to earn an annual income that meets the Self-Sufficiency Standard to meet the real cost of living in our region. The Self-Sufficiency Standard varies by locality. Housing is less expensive in Buckingham and Louisa. Childcare is more expensive in Albemarle and Charlottesville.
The above table shows the estimated number of struggling families that do not make an annual income that meets self-sufficiency as defined by the Self-Sufficiency Standard for each specific locality. For the City of Charlottesville, and Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, and Nelson counties, this is an annual income of around $60,000 for an average family. For Louisa, the annual family income to meet basic needs is roughly $50,000, and for Buckingham, this value is around $45,000. A detailed breakdown of these costs and wages are provided in the Locality Profiles in this report.
Undervalued Labor
A majority (62%) of workers in struggling families are working at least 40 hours per week—the equivalent of a full-time job, as shown in the figure below. This deeper understanding about people in the workforce who are in families earning below the Self-Sufficiency Standard is drawn from the ACS Public Use Microdata Sample provided by the U.S. Census Bureau for the Thomas Jefferson Planning District.9
Those working fewer than full-time weekly hours can be a sign that workers are in jobs with lower wages, few to no health or retirement benefits, and less scheduling stability—and want less vulnerable, full-time jobs. Race and gender can define who has a higher chance of having an unstable job, with black women bearing the weight of vulnerable work.10
We can also identify different categories of struggling families—those who are closer to self-sufficiency and who can more readily earn more with the right opportunities, and those whose earning potential is more limited—and different strategies are required to improve the lives of families within each.
Families in our region generally need to earn between $50,000 and $60,000 annually to meet their basic needs. While some of the struggling families in our community appear to have limited earning capacity (those with incomes under $20,000), most are working and earning income ($20,000-$49,999), just not enough to support their families. These are the families who are closer to self-sufficiency and who can more readily earn more with the right opportunities.
Some families are on fixed incomes or have otherwise reached a more constrained earning potential due to illness, disability, caregiving responsibilities, and other circumstances. These families are unlikely to see their incomes increase appreciably and require sustained subsidy to meet their basic needs. Their survival depends on the strength of the social safety net. But the vast majority of families, however, have the capacity to earn a family-sufficient income.
For most families, low-incomeness is not a constant, not an immutable condition that must be worked around, but a variable that must be changed. For a family experiencing economic struggle, the first question should be: What do they need to increase their income?
Most workers in struggling families are in low-waged employment. The figure below sorts occupations into those groups based on the median wages typically earned in the Charlottesville metro region based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage statistics.11 A large portion (42%) of workers in struggling families are in the lowest paid occupations, those typically earning between $25,610 and $37,760 a year – making it difficult to impossible to meet the Self-Sufficiency Standard for single or two-parent households.
The myth of American meritocracy promotes the idea that those who work hard and play by the rules will get ahead. The flipside of that myth—if you haven’t gotten ahead, it must be because you don’t work hard enough or play by the rules—leads to negative beliefs about the poor in our society and, subsequently, to reduced support for resources and programs meant to reduce the burdens of poverty. Working hard, however, does not guarantee that individuals will get ahead. Take the formulas below:
Hard Work × High Wages = High Income
Hard Work × Low Wages =
Low Income
The difference between these outcomes is not the hard work individuals put in, but the wages paid out. A full-time worker making Virginia’s minimum wage will have a gross income of $24,000 per year.12 To reduce the number of struggling families, therefore, requires an increase in their wages. We need a system that identifies low-income families who are working for a living but who are not valued and help them increase their value in the eyes of their employers.
To get ahead, those workers will need jobs and careers that pay enough to support their families. They need job that do not require them to sacrifice for our benefit by working for less pay than they can live on.
The table below provides information on the types of jobs and the corresponding wages that fall into different earning bands:
Selection of Occupations by Annual Median Wage Earned in the Charlottesville Metro Area1 | ||||
Occupation | Annual Median Wage2 | Employment Rate3 | Occupation Group4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Home Health and Personal Care Aides | $26,720.00 | 16% | Healthcare Support | |
Childcare Workers | $28,390.00 | 3% | Personal Care and Service | |
Cashiers | $28,580.00 | 21% | Sales and Related | |
Fast Food and Counter Workers | $29,190.00 | 24% | Food Preparation and Serving Related | |
Customer Service Representatives | $36,710.00 | 13% | Office and Administrative Support | |
Emergency Medical Technicians | $36,940.00 | 2% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Nursing Assistants | $37,400.00 | 15% | Healthcare Support | |
Healthcare Support Workers, All Other | $37,900.00 | 2% | Healthcare Support | |
Construction Laborers | $38,290.00 | 6% | Construction and Extraction | |
Medical Assistants | $39,500.00 | 4% | Healthcare Support | |
Bus Drivers, Transit and Intercity | $41,120.00 | 3% | Transportation and Material Moving | |
Maintenance and Repair Workers, General | $44,210.00 | 10% | Installation, Maintenance, and Repair | |
Dental Assistants | $45,640.00 | 2% | Healthcare Support | |
Bus Drivers, School | $47,470.00 | 4% | Transportation and Material Moving | |
Automotive Service Technicians and Mechanics | $48,340.00 | 4% | Installation, Maintenance, and Repair | |
Heavy and Tractor-Trailer Truck Drivers | $48,610.00 | 6% | Transportation and Material Moving | |
Carpenters | $48,870.00 | 6% | Construction and Extraction | |
Office and Administrative Support Workers, All Other | $48,900.00 | 3% | Office and Administrative Support | |
Production, Planning, and Expediting Clerks | $50,110.00 | 1% | Office and Administrative Support | |
Graphic Designers | $51,920.00 | 2% | Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media | |
Plumbers, Pipefitters, and Steamfitters | $52,090.00 | 3% | Construction and Extraction | |
Medical Records Specialists | $54,390.00 | 2% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers | $56,190.00 | 4% | Protective Service | |
Clinical Laboratory Technologists and Technicians | $56,380.00 | 2% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Heating, Air Conditioning, and Refrigeration Mechanics and Installers | $56,480.00 | 3% | Installation, Maintenance, and Repair | |
Electricians | $58,630.00 | 7% | Construction and Extraction | |
Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education | $59,260.00 | 9% | Educational Instruction and Library | |
Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education | $60,600.00 | 7% | Educational Instruction and Library | |
Computer User Support Specialists | $60,700.00 | 4% | Computer and Mathematical | |
Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses | $61,120.00 | 4% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Surgical Technologists | $62,880.00 | 1% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians | $64,200.00 | 1% | Architecture and Engineering | |
Radiologic Technologists and Technicians | $74,140.00 | 1% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Accountants and Auditors | $78,820.00 | 10% | Business and Financial Operations | |
Registered Nurses | $81,510.00 | 28% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Dental Hygienists | $92,000.00 | 1% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Construction Managers | $101,490.00 | 2% | Management | |
General and Operations Managers | $105,030.00 | 19% | Management | |
Nurse Practitioners | $134,870.00 | 4% | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | |
Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics; May 2023; https://www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm | ||||
1 A full list of occupations and wages is available here: https://github.com/virginiaequitycenter/orange-dot/blob/main/OrangeDot6_files/microdata/data/occupation_wages.csv | ||||
2 The annual median wage is the boundary between the highest and lowest paid workers in a given occupation. Half of the workers in a given occupation earn more than the median wage, and half the workers earn less than the median wage. | ||||
3 Employment rate is the number of jobs (employment) in the given occupation per 1,000 jobs in the Charlottesville Metro Area | ||||
4 Major occupation groups defined by the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system, used by Federal statistical agencies to classify workers and jobs into occupational categories for the purpose of collecting, calculating, analyzing, or disseminating data. |
The Intersection with Race and Ethnicity
Too many families are struggling in our region, but these burdens are not equally shared. Wealth inequality is higher in the United States than in almost any other developed country.13
Racial wealth inequities reflect the long-standing effects of structural racism, not individual or group traits. Structural racism is defined by current and historic policies, programs, and institutional practices that make it easier for white families to accrue wealth compared to families of color, who face more barriers to wealth building.
This has generated a significant racial and ethnic wealth gap in our country. The graph below, provided by the Urban Institute, shows that this differences in family wealth by race and ethnicity are large and have grown larger over the past four decades.
From the Urban Institute:
In 1983, the average wealth of white families was about $320,000 higher than the average wealth of Black families and Hispanic families. By 2022, white families’ average wealth ($1.4 million) was more than $1 million higher than that of Black families ($211,596) and Hispanic families ($227,544). Put another way, white families had six times the average wealth of Black families and Hispanic families.14
This racial and ethnic wealth gap is clearly visible in our region. In the Thomas Jefferson Planning District, 47% of Black families and 35% of Hispanic families earn below the Self-Sufficiency Standard, compared to 18% of white families. This is a difference of 29% and 17%, respectively. This means there are nearly three times as many Black families and two times as many Hispanic families not earning a real living wage compared to white families.
The figure below provides another way to look at this gap in earnings in our community. It shows that among families not earning enough to be self-sufficient, nearly a quarter (23%) are Black. Compare this to families making above the Self-Sufficiency Standard, where only 6% are Black families.